The Axioms of Logic
These are the foundational presuppositions of rational structure. They are not derived—because derivation presupposes them. They are not optional—because thought cannot occur without them. They are not beliefs—because even disbelief must employ them. They are the structure beneath structure, the form that gives rise to coherence. They are the condition for verification itself.
1. The Law of Identity
Whatever exists, exists as itself.
Formally: A = A
It follows that what exists is not something else.
Formally: A ≠ ¬A
Logical expression: True = True and True ≠ False
To recognize anything is to affirm this law. Every pattern presupposes identity. Without it, differentiation is impossible, and no structure can emerge. If this law is denied, then no object, thought, or relation can be held as distinct. Deny it, and all perception dissolves into formless noise.
2. The Law of Non-Contradiction
No thing can be and not be in the same respect and context.
Formally: ¬(A ∧ ¬A)
Logical expression: True × False = False
This is not merely a rule for propositions, but a universal condition for coherence. No structure can contain incompatible elements and remain stable. If contradiction is permitted, then anything can follow from anything. Structure collapses. Meaning ends. Truth becomes undefined. To reject this law is to reject all intelligibility.
3. The Law of the Excluded Middle
For any existing structure, claim, or state, it either is or is not—no intermediate status is possible.
Formally: A ∨ ¬A
Logical expression: True + False = True
This law does not assert knowledge of which alternative is true—it asserts that one must be. Between presence and absence, no third condition exists. If this law is denied, outcomes become indeterminate, resolution becomes impossible, and inquiry has no path forward. Uncertainty is permitted; indeterminacy is not.
These axioms are not arbitrary rules within logic—they are the ground from which logic arises. They apply not only to language, but to reality itself. Every pattern, every distinction, every moment of thought presumes them. Deny them, and not only philosophy, but the very possibility of knowing, vanishes. They are the first structure. All coherence begins here.
Read next: Reasoning